jump to navigation

Autonomous Radical Feminists April 11, 2009

Posted by antiplondon in Radical Feminism, activism, events, flyers, sex industry advocates.
add a comment

Have been taken out of storage, dusted down, and sent off to work. Read all about it here and here.

Anarchist Bookfair 08 October 24, 2008

Posted by sarahcl in Radical Feminism, activism, events, flyers.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

The Autonomous Radical Feminist blog now has the Anarchist Bookfair 08 flyer up.

Bin the House Bunny Flyer October 20, 2008

Posted by sarahcl in Radical Feminism, activism, flyers, pornography harms.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Why ‘The House Bunny’ Is Not Funny!

‘The House Bunny’ portrays the Playboy Mansion as exciting and fun, and its owner, Hugh Hefner, as a friend of women and girls – a caring ‘father figure’. Don’t be deceived!

Playboy is a porn company – it has made a fortune out of exploiting women

The Playboy Mansion: In The House Bunny Hugh Hefner, owner of Playboy, portrays himself as kindly and generous to the ‘bunnies’. But real-life former ‘house bunny’ Izabella St James speaks of him as being ‘controlling’, ‘manipulative’ and ‘losing his temper easily’. In the Mansion, ‘house bunnies’ have to obey a 9pm curfew, and 82 year old Hefner has numerous 20-something ‘girlfriends’, who are encouraged to have sex with Hefner, to perform sexually for him and to undertake cosmetic surgery as part of ‘girlfriend maintenance’. Does this sound funny?

Playboy magazines: Playboy magazines portray women as endlessly sexually available, and trivialise serious issues such as rape, sexual assault and child sexual abuse. Playboy has printed “humorous” cartoons of women being raped. Playboy has dressed its models up like small children with captions such as “It’s easy to feel paternalistic toward the cuddly type above. Naturally she digs forceful father figures, so come on strong big Daddy.” Playboy makes rape funny and child sexual abuse arousing: see the recent cover of French Playboy above. Does this look like Playboy is a friend of women and girls?

Playboy TV: Playboy runs 6 porn channels in the UK. Film titles blatantly indicate glorification of sexualised violence: ‘Barely 18 Anal Virgins’; ‘Wait Your Turn Bitch!’; ‘Fresh and Juicy Lolitas’; ‘Ripped, Stripped and Shagged’; and ‘Submissive Sluts’. Does this sound like Playboy respects women and girls, or condemns child sexual abuse?

Playboy promotes sexist stereotypes

Playboy typically uses the following terms to refer to women and girls:

Playmate, Pet, Hot girls, Bitch, Nympho, Bimbo, Babes, Bunny, Sluts, Beauties, Plaything, Lolitas

Playboy deals in offensive stereotypes of women: you’re either a dumb blonde or ugly, frigid, a bitch, a social misfit – especially if you’re a feminist! Does this sound like Playboy sees women and girls as human beings?

Playboy is now intent on exploiting young girls

Even before the credit crunch, Playboy profits were down. Now its shares have plummeted – down from $12 a year ago to just $2.33. So Playboy wants to make more money – and it aims to do so by specifically targetting young girls as consumers.

Playboy merchandise: Branded goods such as pencil cases and single duvet covers are targeted to appeal to pre-teen and teenage girls. Playboy is grooming girls as consumers of a porn brand and promoting the Playmate and Playboy bunny as something for young women and girls to aspire to.

The House Bunny: The House Bunny is promoted as a 12A romantic comedy, aimed at appealing to young girls, and distances itself from the realities of Playboy’s longstanding history of exploitation as part of the sex industry.

Don’t fall for it! The House Bunny is not funny!

Feminism in London 08 Workshop Handout October 12, 2008

Posted by antiplondon in FiL08, Radical Feminism, activism, events, flyers, pornography harms, pro-sex anti-porn.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Feminism in London 08 Workshop:

What’s Wrong with Pornography?

Run by Anti-Porn London
Our Blog: http://antipornfeminists.wordpress.com/
Contact: anti.p.london [at] hotmail.com

  • What this is not

This is not a debate about censorship; we are not a lobby group trying to change the law; we are a grass-roots group campaigning for social justice for women. Pornography reinforces the notion that women belong to the sex-class; that we only exist as and for sex, with no autonomy or destiny of our own. Pornography promotes misogyny that limits women’s full participation in society.

  • What we are not

There are generally two types of people who campaign against pornography. One type are social-conservatives who think that sex should only occur under narrow and specific circumstances; the other type are anti-porn feminists, who recognise pornography as violence against the women and children and men used to make it, and recognise the images themselves as hate-speech and anti-woman propaganda.

  • What’s wrong with pornography

Pornography isn’t just about sex

It’s also about power, which, because we live in a hierarchical, male-dominated society (bell hooks calls it a white-supremacist, capitalist patriarchy), means that for most people sex and power are interchangeable and intertwined. To challenge pornography is to challenge hierarchy in all its forms.

It is also about money. Pornography exists only because of money, which is also inextricably intertwined with power in our society. The pornography industry is a multi-billion dollar global industry. The trafficking of women and children into prostitution and pornography is the third largest illegal industry on the planet after drugs and guns.

Pornography creates ‘Men’

Power is gendered. In this society, to be a real man, you must have power over someone (that someone doesn’t have to be biologically female, only socially powerless by comparison). If you have power over someone, that makes you masculine, if you are powerless, that makes you feminine. Pornography reinforces hierarchy, regardless of who is dominating whom in it – this has real consequences in the real world. We are experiencing a backlash against the social advances woman have made, if a man feels powerless in real life, then he can use pornography to reinforce his sense of male supremacy.

Pornography doesn’t expand our sexuality – it stunts it

Mainstream heterosexual pornography dictates a narrow and limited idea of human sexuality. In pornography, male sexuality is predicated on cruelty, coercion and degradation; female sexuality is predicated on submitting to or appearing to enjoy being subjected to cruel, coercive and degrading treatment. Pornography eradicates women’s sexual agency, and makes it harder for women to find out about their own bodies and their own sexuality.

Sexual desire does not develop in a vacuum, the prurient attitude we have to sex in this country, combined with a lack of decent sex education, means that many people use pornography as their primary source of information on what sex is supposed to be like. Mainstream heterosexual pornography portrays sexual violence against women as normal, natural and an inevitable part of male sexuality. It tells men that the sexual abuse of women is exciting, and that women enjoy being abused. It tells women that in order to do sex properly, they have to put up with and enjoy such abuse.

Pornography portrays sex and women as disgusting, the words used to describe women and women’s bodies in pornography betray the fact that women and sex are seen as dirty and disgusting by the men who use it (‘bitch’ ‘cunt’ ‘slut’ ‘fuck toy’ ‘fuck hole’ ‘dirty’ ‘filthy’ etc etc.). Pornography is also racist, in that it employs degrading sexual stereotypes about different ethnic and racial groups.

Pornography promotes misogynistic beauty standards, in mainstream heterosexual pornography women are interchangeable; it trains women and men to see a natural female body – one with pubic hair, or small breasts, or any fat – as unnatural and disgusting.

Working conditions

The porn industry is the only industry in the West where exposure to the risk of violence, harassment, injury and infection are seen as normal and acceptable. It is the only industry where these risks form the work itself.

  • Personal Attacks

You will be called a man-hating anti-sex prude for your beliefs. As with all the misogynist crap that the patriarchy throws at us, it is considered our problem for not changing ourselves so that we like it; the problem with porn isn’t that it’s virulently woman-hating, the problem is ours, for not deciding, in our heads, that we’re fine with it.

  • Pro-porn arguments (and their counter-arguments!)

Porn as ‘free speech’

Pornography is not speech, it is not fantasy. Pornography happens in the real world, to real women; everything you see in pornography happened somewhere to a real woman. If pornography is speech, then the speech of pimps and pornographers is worth more than the lives of women and children.

Porn as sex education

Unfortunately, pornography already acts as sex-education. The idea that all we need is ‘better’ porn to provide ‘better’ education is superficially attractive, but who, then, decides on the curriculum? Pornography exists to make money and to sell as much of its product as possible, you wouldn’t put a junk-food manufacturer in charge of setting nutritional education, why trust pornographers with sex education?

Alt./’DIY’/‘feminist’/gay/lesbian porn

The only difference between alt. porn and mainstream porn is in the beauty standards applied to the women (and even then the differences are only superficial); the women may have died black hair instead of bleached blonde, they will have piercings and tattoos, their breast-implants will not be so obviously fake.

‘DIY’ is a vague term, a lot of porn claims to be ‘amateur’ and a recording of ‘real’ events. If individuals wish to film themselves as part of their sex lives that is their business, but being ‘DIY’ is no guarantee that it will not follow the same pornographic paradigm as mainstream porn.

There are women in the pornography industry who are producers rather than performers, they may call themselves feminists and claim to be making ‘feminist’ porn. They are still part of the porn industry, their porn is sold in the same shops, shown on the same channels, reviewed in the same websites and magazines, and put up for the same industry awards; they are never going to be too critical of other porn, they are never going to bite the hand that feeds them. There is very little difference in content between ‘feminist’ porn and mainstream porn, the women may look like they are enjoying it more, but smiling for the camera doesn’t prove anything.

Pornography made for gay men or lesbians can be just as abusive and produce images that are just as harmful as pornography aimed at heterosexual men. It can still enforce the pornographic paradigm that sex is about having power over someone.

  • Practical things to do

Don’t consume pornography and do not tolerate the consumption of pornography by the men and women you are in relationships with – this is easier said than done of course! Look to other feminists for support, and remember, you are not alone in the way that you feel.

Challenge people’s attitudes to pornography, ask them how they know that the women in it are enjoying it; ask them what smiling for the camera proves.

Join APL and take part in our next Bin the Bunny protest (Sat 25th October)!

What’s wrong with pornography? May 17, 2008

Posted by antiplondon in Radical Feminism, flyers, pornography harms, pro-sex anti-porn, violence against women.
Tags: ,
3 comments

Pornography harms women.

Pornography is not fantasy. Pornography happens in the real world, to real women; everything you see in pornography happened somewhere to a real woman.

The pornography industry is a multi-billion dollar global industry.

Pornography exists to make money. It is an industry that chews women up and spits them out; it is an industry where exposure to violence, harassment, injury and infection are seen as normal and acceptable.

Pornography doesn’t expand our sexuality – it stunts it.

Mainstream heterosexual pornography dictates a narrow and limited idea of human sexuality. In pornography, male sexuality is predicated on cruelty, coercion and degradation; female sexuality is predicated on submitting to or appearing to enjoy being subjected to cruel, coercive and degrading treatment. Pornography eradicates women’s sexual agency, and makes it harder for women to find out about their own bodies and their own sexuality.

Pornography portrays sexual violence against women as normal, natural and an inevitable part of male sexuality.

Sexual desire does not develop in a vacuum. The prurient attitude we have to sex in this country, combined with a lack of decent sex education, means that many people use pornography as their primary source of information on what sex is supposed to be like. Mainstream heterosexual pornography tells men that the sexual abuse of women is exciting, and that women enjoy being abused. It tells women that in order to do sex properly, they have to put up with and enjoy such abuse.

Pornography reinforces male supremacy, and the idea that men are entitled to sexual access to women’s bodies.

Men define themselves as being whatever is not a woman, in order to be a man it is necessary for there to be a subordinate group of women for men to compare themselves to and feel superior to. In mainstream heterosexual pornography men are always the active agents and women are always the passive objects. No man in pornography ever fails to get what he wants; the women in pornography exist solely to satisfy men’s desires, they have no will or desire of their own except to service men’s needs.

Pornography portrays sex and women as disgusting.

The words used to describe women and women’s bodies in pornography betray the fact that women and sex are seen as dirty and disgusting by the men who use it: ‘bitch’ ‘cunt’ ‘slut’ ‘fuck toy’ ‘fuck hole’ ‘dirty’ ‘filthy’ etc etc.

Pornography promotes misogynistic beauty standards.

In mainstream heterosexual pornography women are interchangeable, it trains women and men to see a natural female body – one with pubic hair, or small breasts, or any fat – as unnatural and disgusting.

Pornography affects you.

Even if you are not a pornography consumer, a significant number of the men you interact with every day will be. It’s difficult to imagine that a man can spend a lot of time viewing and masturbating to degrading images of women without that pornographic ideology having a negative effect on his view of women.

Pornography and sex are not the same thing!
Pro-sex, Anti-porn: Free your sexuality from pornography

About Pornography May 17, 2008

Posted by antiplondon in Radical Feminism, flyers, pornography harms, pro-sex anti-porn, quote of the day, violence against women.
Tags: ,
add a comment

The Webmaster Jeff gleefully proclaims on the home page “NEW WHORES DEGRADED EVERY WEDNESDAY!”, and once on the site it was honestly admitted that: “Porn destroys women, that’s why we love it!”

Description of an Internet pornography website, from antipornographyactivist

~

Pornography is the flight from woman, men’s denial of sex as a medium of communication, their denial of sex as the basis for a relationship … As men’s real power dwindles, pornography is their refuge.

Germaine Greer, The Whole Woman

~

[P]ornographers use our bodies as their language. Anything they say, they have to use us to say … If the Constitution protects pornography as speech, our bodies then belong to the pimps who need to use us to say something. They, the humans, have a human right of speech and the dignity of constitutional protection; we, chattel now, moveable property, are their ciphers, their semantic symbols, the pieces they arrange in order to communicate. We are recognized only as the discourse of a pimp.

Andrea Dworkin, “Pornography Happens to Women”

~

The best cure for pornography is sex — I mean autonomously chosen activity, freely engaged in for the sake of real pleasure, intense, and unmistakably the real thing. The more we have experiences like this, the less we will be taken in by the confusions and lies and messes all around us.

Joanna Russ “Pornography and the Doubleness of Sex for Women”

~

So we face a bizarre phenomenon in many discussions of pornography, in that it’s only with respect to sex that many otherwise progressive and leftist people assume that putting something into the capitalist marketplace makes it more free (or is evidence that one is free in doing it). We need to find ways to challenge the naïve and regressive conceptions of freedom as the freedom to enter the marketplace and/or to choose among the options that the marketplace offers us. We need to suggest to people that—in many everyday contexts, but perhaps especially for the most intimate and potentially-creative activities of our lives, like sex and sexuality—real freedom in that activity means neither selling it nor letting somebody with a profit motive tell us what it is supposed to look and feel like.

Rebecca Whisnant “Contemporary Feminism in a Porn Culture”

~

In a society in which so many men are watching so much pornography that is rooted in the pain and humiliation of women, it is not difficult to understand why so many can’t bear to confront it: Pornography forces men to face up to how we have learned to be sexual. And pornography forces women to face up to how men see them.

Robert Jensen, “A cruel edge: The painful truth about today’s pornography, and what men can do about it”

~

Porn is the graphic representation of women’s oppression, which oppression is achieved via the persistent and chronic daily threat of rape or other violence.

Twisty Faster

~

My first experience of a porn set was, to say the least, unsettling. Richard had brought Felicity to watch a gang-bang movie. Ten men were having sex with one girl in a wrestling ring. The overwhelming impression was the stench: of bodies, of sweat, of various other excretions. It was a revolting spectacle, about as erotic as a butcher’s shop. It was also, for obvious reasons, almost impossible to film. The best I could come up with was to concentrate on the litter of spent tissues on the floor. That, and the expression on Felicity’s face, as she saw, for the first time, just what it was she’d got herself into. But this was only the beginning. After a week, I’d seen just about everything. I felt sick. What do you do when a producer shows you snapshots of his wife and kids before filming a simulated rape scene? How do you cope when a director tells you he is running for mayor in his home town and then boasts that his movies make Belsen look like a picnic? The fact is, you don’t. Trapped between your responsibilities as a professional film-maker and your sensibilities as a human being, you only hope that somewhere in your film there’s a truth that needs to be told.

Stephen Walker, “My Fears for all Felicities”

~

Bader, the designated “porn is harmless” talking head, manages to say this:

“Porn is not harmless. But neither is it an important cause of sexual violence or misogyny […] The actors in these films are degraded, underpaid and used up by an industry with the morals of a slaughterhouse, despite what Jenna Jameson and Nina Hartley say. The women come into the industry with the self-esteem of earthworms, histories of physical and sexual abuse, and are often plunged into alcohol and drug abuse as a way of coping with their jobs.”

In other words, somehow the process of making porn is not the “cause” of the sexual violence and misogyny experienced by the women used in the making of porn — who, he admits, very commonly resort to self-medication with alcohol and other drugs to numb the various kinds of pain inflicted by their work.

Let’s deconstruct that, because it’s important. What he is really saying — listen closely — is that the violence caused by the porn industry to the expendable class of prostituted women used by the industry doesn’t count. What counts is whether porn causes men who consume it to do “real” sexual violence, meaning violence to “respectable” females (presumably white and/or middle class and not officially prostituted).

DeAnander, “In the case of Clueless vs. Clueless … (Sex & Aggression)”