Daily Archives: January 22nd, 2013

What About the Johns?

There is another case of child grooming and sexual exploitation in the courts at the moment, similar to the Rochdale case, this time in Oxford.

What this report makes very clear, is that the girls were being groomed for prostitution; in which case, what about the johns?

These johns were men who were happy to travel long distances, ‘by appointment’ to pay to rape young girls, so are they being looked for by the police?

These johns were happy to pay to rape girls as young as eleven, girls who would have been covered with bruises and cuts and burns, girls who were given “so many drugs they were barely aware of what was going on”.

But, according to sex industry advocates, we are supposed to believe, that if the prostitution industry was decriminalised, then these very same johns would help police the industry and prevent child exploitation.

These johns are not just one or two men (it wouldn’t be profitable otherwise), they are numerous, they are otherwise ‘normal’ men, some will have wives and daughters, some will be ‘upstanding’ members of their communities, most won’t fit into the new, acceptable ‘Asian gang’ stereotype of a child abuser.

Prostitution exists because of demand, and because of male entitlement, and these things are not race-specific.

Vulnerable girls as young as 11 were groomed, subjected to acts of “extreme depravity” and trafficked around the UK for sex by a gang of men based in Oxford, a court has heard .

Over a period of eight years the nine men made the girls’ lives a “living hell”, subjecting them to extreme physical and sexual violence, selling some victims for prostitution in Oxford and trafficking others around the country, an Old Bailey jury was told.

It took more than half an hour to read out the 51 counts against the men, who sat impassively in the dock, accused of crimes including rape, forcing a child into prostitution and trafficking.

The jury of seven men and five women heard that from 2004 to early 2012 six complainants were plied with drugs and drink, and raped, sometimes by several men and sometimes “for days on end”.

The men targeted children in care or from chaotic backgrounds, the jury heard. Once groomed, the girls could then be used to recruit other children into the sex ring. Some of the girls, ranging in age from 11 to 15, were groomed to be child prostitutes, for which some men in the gang received payments.

[…]

The nine face 19 counts of rape, seven of them with a child aged under 13. Other counts include arranging or facilitating child prostitution, trafficking within the UK for sexual exploitation and using an instrument to procure a miscarriage.

Noel Lucas QC, prosecuting said: “The depravity of what was done to the complainants was extreme.”

He told the jury that they would have to steel themselves to hear the evidence. “The facts in this case will make you feel uncomfortable. Much of what the girls were forced to endure was perverted in the extreme.”

The children were taken to guest houses and empty houses, thought to be kept for the abuse, and prevented from escaping.

They were subjected to “humiliating and degrading conduct”, including biting, suffocation, burning and scratching. Weapons, including knives, baseball bats, knives and meat cleavers were used during the torture, the court heard.

The jury was told that sometimes men had urinated on the girls, who were raped vaginally, orally and anally.

The children were groomed in a variety of ways, given gifts or “simply shown the care and attention they very much craved”, said Lucas.

“The attention lavished on the girls at the outset was of course entirely insincere, as it was merely a device, you may conclude once you hear the evidence, to exploit their vulnerability,” he said.

He said the girls were also given “so many drugs they were barely aware of what was going on – indeed they say it was the only way they could cope with what was going on”.

The men gave the girls cannabis, cocaine, crack and sometimes heroin.

“The girls became addicted to certain of the drugs and felt unable to live without them. This made them even more dependent on the men,” he said.

The men, who were arrested by Thames Valley police as part of Operation Bullfinch, controlled the girls in their power entirely.

They were threatened “that should they ever seek to free themselves from the grasp of the group they and their families would suffer serious harm”.

The men targeted girls who were unlikely to be believed and whose behaviour would be seen as delinquent, said Lucas. It was, according to one of the girls “a living hell” from which there was no escape.

The gang took some of the girls to empty houses where other men from as far away as Bradford, Leeds, London and Slough, would “come by appointment” to pay to have sex with them, Lucas said.

On other occasions girls were ferried to London and Bournemouth.

Full article here