Pimps Posing as “Sex Worker Activists”

From Secret Life of a Manhattan Call Girl (full text with links)

Well meaning people think most “sex workers activist” organizations/unions speak for women in prostitution. They are mistaken. A shocking number of these “sex worker” organizations were started by women and men who are admitted pimps and madams, or have been convicted of pimping, pandering, or conspiracy to promote prostitution. These people call themselves ‘sex workers’ but it’s a ruse. It’s an unacceptable conflict of interest. These organizations and their ‘partners’ and affiliates cannot be allowed to speak for women in prostitution or collect funds on their behalf. Any NGO, university, college or nonprofit organization that engages with these pimp-affiliated organizations or their partners is assisting them in this misrepresentation. I’m sure there are some well-meaning people trying to good within these groups. But with pimp founders and leaders, these groups mostly advocate on behalf of the predators who profit off of sexual exploitation; they rarely help women in prostitution.

A pimp is someone who makes money from another’s prostitution. A madam is a female pimp. Whether they call themselves managers, brothel owners, escort agency owners — they are all pimps. As a survivor of ten years of trafficking/prostitution, I have a right to use this word. If someone poisons another in cold blood, it doesn’t matter if they call themselves a life extinguisher or claim they’re an innovative longevity re-allocation businesswoman. They’re still a murderer. A pimp is still a pimp, no matter what name they peddle.

But pimps don’t like that word. So these founders and leaders of ‘sex worker activist’ organizations say they’re sex workers. They appropriate the identity of those they exploit. It’s a bit like a plantation owner in blackface pretending to be one of the slaves they oppress. They’re trying to steal our survivor voices.

Douglas Fox, the main ‘activist’ at the International Union of Sex Workers, claims to be a male sex worker. But he and his partner John Dottery were featured as the owners of a large UK escort agency in the British documentary ‘The Escort Agency.’ On a website he co-edits Fox states his partner owns an escort agency and argues ridiculously that pimps are ‘sex workers.’ He also states ” The fact that paedophiles produce and distribute and earn money from selling sex may make them sex workers.”

The first so-called ‘sex worker activist’ group in the United States was Whores, Housewives and Others (WHO) which eventually became COYOTE. It was founded by Margo St. James, who like Douglas Fox claimed to be a prostitute when she was actually a pimp. She’s admitted to being convicted of running a disorderly house – a brothel – in 1962.

The Sex Workers’ Outreach Project USA (SWOP USA) was founded by Robyn Few the year after she pled guilty to conspiracy to promote prostitution via a multistate prostitution ring, a federal felony. This means that like St. James, Few was also convicted of charge related to pimping. As a survivor of ten years of prostitution myself, I would never feel safe around male or female pimp (madam). Most women in prostitution wouldn’t. Thus organizations like SWOP USA can’t speak for us. Few calls herself a ‘sex worker’ most of the time so the conflict of interest isn’t obvious. But the SWOP website makes a point of acknowledging her conviction. Why? Because pimps across the country are using SWOP to connect with Johns while they recruit vulnerable young women. This isn’t activism, it’s marketing while lobbying for pimp interests.

SWOP USA and COYOTE aren’t the only ‘sex worker activist’ organizations founded by a female pimp. The Erotic Service Providers Union is led by Maxine Doogan who was convicted of running an escort service. Like Robyn Few, Maxine Doogan poses as a ‘sex worker. She claims that legislation which helps pimps is good for women in prostitution. Terri Jean Bedford, who was widely represented in the Canadian media as an advocate of women in prostitution, was convicted of running a brothel. So she’s also a pimp.

Executive Director of COYOTE/ Los Angeles Norma Jean Almodovar was convicted of pandering while she was working as a cop. As such she is part of a long tradition of police officers involved in the prostitution of other women. It’s an unholy alliance that sends women in prostitution the message they can’t get out and they can’t get help. Like Robyn Few, Norma Jean Almodovar calls herself a ‘sex worker,’ but details the pandering conviction on her nonprofit organization website.

Now when a survivor of trafficking/prostitution such as myself happens to bring up this conflict of interest, the parties in question react as if viciously attacked. But there’s nothing personal about saying someone has a conflict of interest. It’s a statement of existing conditions not a vendetta. The majority stockholders of Walmart can’t speak for the company’s minimum wage employees because what benefits those stakeholders may be bad for the workers. But in the ‘sex worker activist’ movement, pimps pretend to be workers when in fact they are management — the ones in control.

No wonder SWOP -USA, COYOTE, The Erotic Services Providers’ Union, the International Union of Sex Workers as well as their partners and affiliates which include the Desiree Alliance, the Red Umbrella Project, and Prostitutes of New York (PONY) support policies that protect pimps rather than women in prostitution. PONY actually claims to “reach out” to Madam members. I’m sure there are well-meaning people not connected with pimping trying to good within these groups.

We trafficking/prostitution survivors have had enough. We’re going to start calling out the NGOS, universities, and academics who tacitly support and encourage these pimp-led groups. The concept of fruit of the poisonous tree applies here. Any organization that partners or collaborates with these groups is tainted by association They can’t speak for us or collect funds on our behalf.

To be clear: There is a position in a pimp-led ‘family’ called a “bottom bitch.” These women are subject to brutal violence and end up ‘assisting’ the pimp. These women are victims in a tragic domestic violence situation, not pimps. But there’s a world of difference between a ‘bottom bitch” and a madam running a brothel or escort service, who is usually associated with organized crime and can enforce any threat.

4 responses

  1. Reblogged this on loveangellove and commented:
    Important info that should affect which “Prostitution Activist Unions” you choose to support in the future.

  2. No really – males claiming they are male prostitutes but are in reality the pimps and brothel owners! Yes hard to recognise is it not – but this is how pornstitution industry operates by having powerful male pimps and male procurers claim they were/are working in prostitution.

    Yes these men are involved in prostitution but they are the ones procuring women and girls for the innumerable male buyers to purchase and then subject to sadistic male sexual violence. But pornstitution industry is never concerned with the facts instead it constantly portrays a ‘fantasy land’ as reality because these male pimps and male procurers don’t want the truth to be told. Yes women too are pimps but they are not the ones with the real power because there is always a male in charge of these female pimps and that is how pornstitution operates by having a hierarchy with men as usual the ones on top and in control of women.

  3. And here is one more for the list: the spokesperson for Rose Alliance, the Swedish sex worker “union-something-organisation” Pye Jakobsson, is in fact a member of the board in a strip club.


    In Denmark it is brothel owners and escort service owners in SIO (Sexarbejdernes Interesse Organisation) and the spokesperson is a brothel owner.

  4. Hi Anne R., thanks for the link. Unfortunately, this kind of thing doesn’t surprise me at all.

    Google translate didn’t do a very good job of translating from Danish to English for me, any chance of you leaving a translation of the salient bits in the comments here?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: