QotD: “Radical feminism does not share goals with the religious right”

You hear this lie crop up again and again, so often that it’s become a thought-terminating cliche: if radical feminism shares goals (like abolishing pornography and sex work) with the religious right, doesn’t that make their ideologies one and the same?

It’s used to shut down all feminist conversations about the harms of the pornography industry by buying into the lie that the only manifestation of patriarchal sexual values is puritanical. It also contains a lie within itself, by drawing a false equivalence between the movements based on their “goals” by naming something that isn’t the goal of either movement.

The “goal,” or ultimate end of radical feminist thought and action is the dismantling of oppressive power structures that exist to subjugate women as a class in order to liberate those women. The goal of religious conservatism is to prop up, reinforce, and otherwise maintain those same oppressive power structures that create a hierarchy of power between the sexes, with women subjugated to men. That a facet of each of the movements is, prima facie, the same does not mean that the movements themselves are the same. Radical feminism seeks to abolish pornography and sex work because it views them as harmful to women and antithetical to our liberation. The religious right seeks to abolish pornography and sex work because they view it these institutions as promoting unsanctified sexuality, and their opposition to these institutions is often tenuous or surface at best — while it is an ostensible goal of the movement to oppose, it is not uncommon to find lurking under the surface use of and support for these institutions as the proper place for women they consider undesirable. The virgin/whore dichotomy exists for a reason.

If the religious right succeeded in banning pornography tomorrow, radical feminism would not cease to exist. Radical feminism would not have achieved its aim, as all facets of radical feminist thought exist with the aim to support women’s liberation. The abolition of sex work that is not born from women, does not come from women refusing to be commodified, does not teach men that our bodies and our sexualities do not exist to be controlled or used by them is not the abolition that radical feminism seeks.

If you can’t see the difference between the two, I really don’t think you’ve done a whole lot of thinking about it.

Thank you Next Years Girl, for writing this stuff so I don’t have to!

Advertisements

6 responses

  1. Conservatives think women are individual sexual property and liberals think women are communal sexual property. Radical thought exists outside this small continuum.

  2. The religious right, as a group, also cares less about the exploitation of women and more about what offends their faith. They may express “pity” for the “lost souls” of who works the porn industry, but it’s a paternalistic view, where victims and perpertrators are defined with the same broad label of “sinners”.

    The harm caused by of porn isn’t a matter of obscenity, it’s the violation of basic human rights of people who are forced (directly or indirectly) into degrading acts.

    What is harmful isn’t the acts of having sex in front of a camera by itself, but the violent, sexist attitudes behind the”plot” (what little there is) of the pornographic films. Starting from the idea that women are only supposed to bring pleasure to men and moving to humiliation of women, name calling and outright violence, to say nothing of the even more disturbing material (“revenge” porn, simulated rape, etc.)

    (For the sake of conversation I’m only talking about “mainstream” porn here. Worse stuff exist but it’s usually seen as bad even by the most fervent “feminist” porn supporters.)

    In a perfect world where sexism never existed the act of two consenting adults filming themselves while having sex wouldn’t be something I’d be against in principle. Too bad this perfect world is just a thought experiment, and we have a really ugly wolrd out before our eyes.

  3. […] the idea that the sex industry is a bad thing; we don’t even think it’s a bad thing for the same reasons! But hey, why bother with real debate when you can shut down critical thinking with a […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: