Daily Archives: September 21st, 2014

WHO: What do we mean by “sex” and “gender”?

I want to have a screen grab of this on record, in case the WHO ever cave in to the trans/genderist dogma that insists on collapsing into one two distinct concepts.

WHO sex and gender

Sometimes it is hard to understand exactly what is meant by the term “gender”, and how it differs from the closely related term “sex”.

“Sex” refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women.

“Gender” refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women.

To put it another way:

“Male” and “female” are sex categories, while “masculine” and “feminine” are gender categories.

Aspects of sex will not vary substantially between different human societies, while aspects of gender may vary greatly.

Some examples of sex characteristics :

Women menstruate while men do not
Men have testicles while women do not
Women have developed breasts that are usually capable of lactating, while men have not
Men generally have more massive bones than women

Some examples of gender characteristics :

In the United States (and most other countries), women earn significantly less money than men for similar work
In Viet Nam, many more men than women smoke, as female smoking has not traditionally been considered appropriate
In Saudi Arabia men are allowed to drive cars while women are not
In most of the world, women do more housework than men

The mental contortions genderists go through to ‘prove’ that biological sex does not exists (while, on the other hand, gender roles are hardwired and immutable in our otherwise plastic brains), are hilarious (but also disturbing).

How has denying science and reality become the most important piece of ‘social justice’ activism for a large number of people?

How do these people function in the real world?

Why is ‘gender’ so important, why can’t they just accept that what they are describing is personality?

I think part of the answer (and I am by no means the first person to say this), is that minutely policing others’ use of language is an easy substitute for real world action; why stand on a picket or protest line when you could be sitting at home listing your privileges and your genders and your pronouns and your sexualities. This is pure narcissism as ‘activism’.

female penises exist male vaginas exist

I want to note that the way the sex binary looks like it’s present throughout the animal world is that white scientists have a terrible habit of labeling everything “male” or “female”

“White scientists” sounds pretty racist to me, as it is erasing all the non-white people who have contributed to science and technology and medicine over the decades. This is actually a pretty sad old rhetorical trick genderists play, to label anything they don’t like as ‘racist’ without anything to back it up.

(Yes, there are white scientists who are racist, and there is bad science that is used for racist purposes, but science itself is just a way of exploring, examining and testing our knowledge of reality, that isn’t racist, or gendered, in itself.)

Biology is transphobic

Transphobic folks with transphobic science conveniently forget that some species can be naturally trans and none of the other creatures in that species shit on them for gender swapping or allying with the opposite gender

“Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment”

Prosecutions for stalking and harassment increased by more than 20% last year following the enforcement of a new law that criminalises behaviour causing serious alarm or distress.

The number of cases are expected to grow, according to Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, as victims become more confident about coming forward to seek help, and as cyber-stalking becomes more prevalent.

The figures have been released as the Crown Prosecution Service and the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) publish details of an agreement to improve cooperation and provide greater support to victims who have been repeatedly followed, contacted, spied on or threatened.

Last year, marking a rise of almost 22%, 10,535 people in England and Wales were prosecuted for stalking and harassment, compared to 8,648 people in 2012/13, the CPS revealed.

Convictions and the number of restraining orders issued have also risen. More than 700 of the cases last year were brought under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 which introduced fresh powers to charge stalkers even when they do not directly threaten the targeted person.

The law, which came into force late 2012, makes it an offence to follow, contact, monitor the email of, loiter near, watch or spy upon, someone if it causes “serious alarm or distress” and has a “substantial adverse effect” on their usual day-to-day activities.

The new agreement between the CPS and Acpo notes: “Stalking offences can also be committed in an online environment, [such as] through social media platforms. The principles for investigating ‘online’ stalking are the same as those that apply to any form of stalking.”

It also reminds police and prosecutors to ensure that victims have the opportunity to provide a personal statement to court; to investigate why any victim withdraws a complaint to check it is not due to pressure; and to consult victims on bail and restraining orders for suspects.

The CPS said there had also been a sharp increase in the number of breaches of restraining and non-molestation orders, the majority of which relate to domestic violence and can involve stalking-like behaviour. Prosecutions rose by 14.6% in 2013/14 to 18,149 cases.

Full article here