QotD: “the notion of victimization is unintelligible given that she experiences her subordination as agency”

… [O]ne participant in Phillips’s study does explicitly reflect, “There are times when women can’t control the shit that men do to them. I mean, come on, men are really the ones with all the real power. But I figure, as long as I’m already going to get screwed, at least maybe I can set the terms of the abuse or humiliation” (149). While openly acknowledging that her agency is defined by male interests, she assumes this situation to be inevitable rather than open to transformation. It follows that her experience precludes the label “victimization” or “rape”: the notion of victimization is unintelligible given that she experiences her subordination as agency – an agency defined by negotiating the terms of her subordination.

Toward a Phenomenology of Sex-Right: Reviving Radical Feminist Theory of Compulsory Heterosexuality, by Kathy Miriam

(Found at (ex)Gynocraticgrrl, via Pomeranian Privilege)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: