QotD: “the most important approach for officers is to see the victim first, see the crime second”

Granting victims of slavery immunity from prosecution to give evidence about exploitation will be a key tool in tackling organised gangs, according to the officer in charge of coordinating new investigative powers.

The modern slavery bill, due to pass into law before the election, will help the 13,000 people estimated to be working under duress in the UK but may also put pressure on police resources, warned Shaun Sawyer, chief constable of Devon and Cornwall.

Sawyer, who is lead officer on slavery for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said people are being forced to work in increasingly diverse circumstances: in car washes, cannabis farms, brothels, meat packing factories, on fishing boats, in nail bars, domestic servitude and as pickpockets.

His comments were made as the College of Policing puts out to consultation on Wednesday guidance to help frontline officers identify and investigate modern slavery. He told the Guardian that the most important approach for officers is to “see the victim first, see the crime second”.

The modern slavery bill contains a provision giving police and prosecutors wide discretion in whether to ignore minor offences committed by victims of slavery in order to assemble cases against those who exploit them.

“It’s the only way from my perspective to get the best evidence and to bring serious and organised criminals to book,” Sawyer explained. “If you are forced to commit a crime but you are enslaved it would seem to be against natural justice to [be] prosecuted.” Anyone who committed a serious offence, such as murder, would not escape prosecution, however.

Officers should keep an open mind when dealing with the vulnerable who have been enslaved and not assume they behaved like others, Sawyer added. “I don’t think unless you have been enslaved you can get your mind around the level of disempowerment,” he said. “Officers might say: ‘Surely you had access to a car or a phone [and could escape easily]’ if someone had been in domestic servitude.

“It’s about keeping professionally curious. Don’t assume. We might say surely they could take control but they are mentally if not physically disempowered from taking any action.”

Full article here

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: