“Police saw Rotherham child sex abuse victims as prostitutes, says PCC”

Nothing was done about child sexual exploitation in South Yorkshire because the girls involved were seen as prostitutes, a police commissioner has said.

Alan Billings, police and crime commissioner for the local force, said “it all went wrong” because police did not understand what grooming was or that it was child abuse.

Billings was speaking after reports revealed that police were warned 10 years ago about the extent of the problem in South Yorkshire but did nothing about it.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I don’t think any of us at that time understood what grooming was and that this was grooming.

“I think we saw these girls not as victims but as troublesome young people out of control and willing participants. We saw it as child prostitution rather than child abuse, and I think that was broadly accepted and that’s why it all went wrong.”

Billings said police were prioritising burglary and car theft because of public demands at the time.

He added that the problem was a cultural issue, which went beyond South Yorkshire police.

A report by Prof Alexis Jay published last August revealed that at least 1,400 children were raped, trafficked and groomed in Rotherham.

full article here

5 responses

  1. how is child prostitution not child abuse?! it’s ok if you rape a child for money but not if you do it for free?

  2. Well quite!

    There was (and still is) this idea that there are ‘pure’ victims, who are worthy of patriarchal protection, and dumb sluts who are asking for it, and deserve it.

    The police saw those child victims of commercial sexual exploitation as the latter.

  3. More widely, there is this attitude, that victimisation turns the victim into something deserving of victimisation, that they are – and therefore always were – natural, fundamental victims, who provoke and draw violence down upon themselves.

    The perpetrator of said victimisation is, of course, invisible in this understanding of the world.

  4. Oh yes, I know, thanks. My criticism aimed at them and not you. Just trying to point out what a load of BS their defence is.

  5. No worries, my replies are always half for anyone else reading as well!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: