The Guardian called commercially raped children ‘workers’ AGAIN

The article has been changed since I saw it early this afternoon, but I screen grabbed it. You can clearly see from the address that it is the same article, and that in the earlier version, the journalists use the term ‘underage sex workers’.

It is as ridiculous as it is unethical, how can a raped child be a worker, how can rape be work, how can a rapist be an employer? Do words mean anything?

The people being quoted in the article talk about a paedophile ring, how is it appropriate to label any of that ‘sex work’?

I have contacted the Guardian on this subject before, several times, and received no reply, but I am going to keep on trying:

Dear Editors,

I am writing to you, again, to complain about the use of the term ‘sex work’ in relation to commercially raped children.

In today’s article ‘Oxfam warned it could lose European funding over scandal’ (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/12/haiti-demands-oxfam-identify-workers-who-used-prostitutes), in its 12:21 iteration ‘Haiti demands Oxfam identify staff who paid sex workers’, the term ‘underage sex workers’ was used.

I have written to you before, on several occasions over the past four years, about this subject, and have yet to receive any reply. What I would like, is for a Guardian editor to justify to me this dishonest and unethical use of language, in a publication that portrays itself as a quality newspaper.

How can a raped child be a worker, how can rape be work, how can a rapist be an employer?

As I said the last time, I will not give a penny to the Guardian while it continues to report on the commercial sexual exploitation of children in this way.

Abi

guardian.readers@theguardian.com
international@theguardian.com

Advertisements

5 responses

  1. This very clearly shows how deep their insanity goes in this regard. These aren’t workers in any way, they are victims of horrible abuse.

  2. […] via The Guardian called commercially raped children ‘workers’ AGAIN — Anti-Porn Feminists […]

  3. […] from AI. But, it seems, she is not a thorough Guardian reader, otherwise she would have seen the report last week calling the commercial sexual exploitation of children in Haiti ‘underage sex…. (And in fairness to The Observer, it and the Guardian are editorially independent, the Observer […]

  4. Here’s the Guardian this morning, still calling commercially raped women ‘sex workers’, even though the people they are reporting on are using the term ‘prostitution’.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/feb/20/davis-accused-of-living-in-cloud-cuckoo-land-after-claiming-brexit-wont-create-mad-max-dystopia-politics-live

    It is impossible not to conclude that this is deliberate and ideological.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: